Files
gh-action-readme/.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md
Ismo Vuorinen 3fbb608f9f feat: update go version, renovate config, tooling, fixes (#28)
* feat(deps): update go version, renovate config, tooling

* chore(deps): update google/go-github to v74

* feat(deps): migrate from yaml.v3 to goccy/go-yaml

* chore(deps): update goccy/go-yaml to v1.18.0 and address security concerns

* feat: improve issue templates and project configuration

- Update GitHub issue templates with CLI-specific fields for better bug reports
- Add specialized templates for documentation, theme, and performance issues
- Update pre-commit config to include comprehensive documentation linting
- Remove outdated Snyk configuration and security references
- Update Go version from 1.23+ to 1.24+ across project
- Streamline README.md organization and improve clarity
- Update CHANGELOG.md and CLAUDE.md formatting
- Create comprehensive CONTRIBUTING.md with development guidelines
- Remove TODO.md (replaced by docs/roadmap.md)
- Move SECURITY.md to docs/security.md

* docs: fix markdown linting violations across documentation

* fix: resolve template placeholder issues and improve uses statement generation

* fix: remove trailing whitespace from GitHub issue template
2025-08-07 05:22:44 +03:00

1.6 KiB

name, about, title, labels, assignees
name about title labels assignees
Feature request Suggest an enhancement for gh-action-readme [FEATURE] enhancement ivuorinen

Feature category What type of enhancement is this?

  • New theme
  • New output format
  • CLI command enhancement
  • Validation improvement
  • Configuration option
  • Template customization
  • Performance optimization
  • Integration (CI/CD, tools)
  • Other: ___________

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Describe the current limitation or friction in your GitHub Actions documentation workflow.

Describe the solution you'd like A clear description of the desired functionality. Include:

  • Proposed CLI syntax (if applicable)
  • Expected behavior
  • Sample input/output

Use case and impact Describe your specific GitHub Actions documentation scenario:

  • What types of actions would benefit?
  • How many action.yml files does this affect?
  • What workflow improvement would this provide?

Proposed implementation If you have ideas about implementation:

  • New CLI flags: --flag-name
  • Configuration options
  • Template modifications
  • Integration points

Sample action.yml Provide a sample action.yml that would showcase this feature:

# Example action.yml that would benefit from this feature

Expected output Show what the generated documentation should look like:

# Expected documentation output

Alternatives considered Describe alternative solutions or workarounds you've considered.

Additional context Add any other context, mockups, or examples about the feature request.